Announcement PDF www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 21st January 2026 HIGHLIGHTS • • o o o o • • Comment from Executive Chairman, Brett Grosvenor: www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 • • www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 • • • • www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Appendix A: Peak View JORC Code, 2012 Table Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Rock Chip Sampling • Rock Chips are broken from outcrop or float using a steel Estwing geological hammer, the entire sample (nominal 0.5kg) is pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay (AU-AA23) to analyse for Au and 0.25g is used for multielement analysis (ME-MS61), where it uses a four acid digestion to dissolve nearly all minerals. It’s then measured using a mass spectrometer and optical emission spectrometer. • Sample locations are marked using handheld GPS • Sampling is conducted by Company personnel • Lithology, alteration and mineralogy are logged in the field and entered into a spreadsheet by a company geologist Historic sampling • Historic sampling include: o Stream sediment sampling by multiple explorers (WMC 1971, Delta Gold 1993). o Soil sampling campaigns by WMC at Peak View Prospect. o Drilling by WMC during 1978-82 period (14 holes), Denehurst in 1995-96 (2 holes) and Ironbark Zinc during 2010-2012 (11 holes) at Peak View Prospect with 1,170 samples analysed for Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Ag. Some of the samples were assayed for Au. • Analytical methods included AAS and fire assay; however, QAQC protocols from the 1975-1995 are not consistently documented in available reports. • Rock chips collected by Peak View Exploration were pulverized to produce a 25g charge for aqua regia digestion with a MS analytical finish to analyze www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary for 52 elements (AR25/MS52) Drilling Techniques • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • 27 drill holes completed historically between 1975-2012, comprising: o WMC 1978 – 1982: 14 diamond drillholes for total of 1,852 metres with an average of 132 m. o Denehurst 1995-96: 2 diamond drillholes for total of 291 m. o Ironbark Zinc 2010-2012: 11 diamond drill holes for total of 1,710 m. • Hole orientations generally –60° toward local grid west. • Diamond holes were NQ/HQ Size. • Drilling unit was track mounted. • Core orientation methods not documented in available reports. Drill Sample Recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • Recovery records are limited or inconsistently reported in historic drilling programs. • No systematic recording of core recovery or sample quality documented for early programs (1975-1995). • Potential sample bias due to preferential loss in broken ground zones cannot be assessed from available data. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • Historic core has been geologically logged to varying standards depending on the operator and time period. • Logging generally qualitative in nature, focusing on lithology, alteration, and mineralisation. • Core photography not systematically undertaken in early programs. • Detailed structural logging limited, though some programs noted shear- foliation oriented N-S with steep dip. • Most intersections appear to have been logged, though detail level varies significantly between operators. www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary Subsampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub- sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled • Core sampling methods are not consistently documented across all historic programs. • RC samples collected at 0.66 m intervals in most programs; Diamond drilling samples collected at 0.1 m intervals. • Sample preparation procedures varied between operators and time periods. • No documented field duplicate or second-half sampling programs. • Quality control procedures for sub-sampling are not systematically documented for early programs. • Rock Chips are broken from outcrop or float using a steel Estwing geological hammer, the entire sample (nominal 0.5kg) is pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay (AU-AA23) to analyse for Au and 0.25g is used for multielement analysis (ME-MS61), where it uses a four-acid digestion to dissolve nearly all minerals. It’s then measured using a mass spectrometer and optical emission spectrometer. • Rock chips collected by Peak View Exploration were pulverized to produce a 25g charge for aqua regia digestion with a MS analytical finish to analyze for 52 elements (AR25/MS52) • In-Lab QA/QC procedures include insertion of standards, blanks and duplicates, grind checks and repeat analyses are standard procedure. • A 0.5kg sample size for a Rock Chip is an acceptable industry standard and considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation being targeted and the grainsize of the rock being sampled. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument • Historic assaying conducted using: o Fire assay for gold analysis (considered total extraction method) o Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) for gold and base metals. • Laboratories used not consistently documented. • QAQC procedures: Standards, blanks, and duplicates not systematically implemented in early programs (1975-1995). • Modern program (Ironbark 2007-2012) implemented better QAQC, but www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established. specific details not provided in available reports. • No documented external laboratory checks or round-robin testing. • Previous rock chip program (Peak View Exploration 2022-2023) implemented sound QAQC consisting of duplicates, standards (OREAS622 & OREAS232b) and blanks • The latest program (Exultant Mining 2025 - Present) uses ALS Orange and considers its procedures for sample preparation, fusion and analysis industry standard. • In-Lab QA/QC procedures include insertion of standards, blanks and duplicates, grind checks and repeat analyses are standard procedure. • A 0.5kg sample size for a rock chip sample is an acceptable industry standard and considered appropriate for the style of mineralisation being targeted and the grainsize of the rock being sampled. • QA/QC samples are behaving within acceptable thresholds. • Accuracy and precision levels are not established for historic data. Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data • Limited verification of significant intersections documented. • Data entry and verification procedures not documented for most historic programs. • Primary data storage protocols vary by operator - some data may be housed with NSW Department of Primary Industries. • No systematic independent verification of historic results undertaken. • Data acquired during logging of rock chip samples is captured in Microsoft Excel and incorporated into the digital database Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and downhole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Historic survey methods not consistently documented. • Local grid systems used by different operators (WMC) may not be consistent. • Coordinate system conversions between different programs may introduce errors. • Down-hole surveys: Methods not documented for most programs. • Topographic control: Adequate for the low-relief terrain (maximum relief www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary ~700 m). • Grid system: Various local grids used historically; modern programs used MGA94 Zone 55. • Collar survey accuracy estimated at ±5-10 m for early programs, improving to ±1-2 m for modern programs (Ironbark). • Data points in the field are collected using a handheld Garmin GPSMAP® 65S MULTI-BAND Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied • Data points in the field are collected using a handheld Garmin GPSMAP® 65S MULTI-BAND with a nominal accuracy of +/- 5m • Grid system is GDA2020 Zone 55 • RC/Diamond drilling: Variable spacing, generally 25-100 m apart. • Data spacing insufficient for resource estimation at Peak View prospect. • Most of the prospect strike length only tested by shallow drilling with wide spacing. • Rock chip samples are point samples and are not adequate for Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimations Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • Historic drilling generally oriented -60° toward local grid west. • Mineralisation orientation: Steeply east-dipping shear zones parallel to N-S striking thrust faults. • Main lode plunge: Peak View ~25° to north. • Drilling orientation appears appropriate for intersecting the steeply-dipping mineralised zones. • Potential bias: Some oblique intersection of moderately north-plunging shoots but not considered to introduce significant sampling bias. • Rock chip samples are collected where there is adequate outcrop Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security • Sample security measures not documented for historic programs. • Chain of custody procedures not consistently reported. • Sample storage and handling protocols varied between operators and time periods. • No evidence of systematic sample security issues affecting results. www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary • Rock chip samples are collected within calico bags and stored in sealed polyweave bags that are secured on pallets for transport • Pallets of samples are transported via a freight company to ALS Orange • The facility at ALS Orange is presumed to be secured and locked with an adequate and regularly monitored security system Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • No systematic audits or reviews of historic sampling techniques documented. • No independent technical audits of historic exploration programs identified. • Data compilation and review ongoing as part of current technical assessment. • The sampling methods being used are industry standard practice. • The laboratory holds ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation for testing and calibration, ensuring the technical competence of the facility. • The management system of Australian Laboratory Services Pty. Ltd. located at 10 Leewood Drive, Orange, NSW, is certified to ISO 9001:2015 standards. • Historic samples reported (Peak View Exploration) used Intertek Adelaide laboratory which holds an ISO 17025 accreditation for testing and calibration, ensuring the technical competence of the facility. Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • Tenements: EL9411 (32 sub-blocks) granted 31/5/2022, expires 31/5/2028; EL8931 (10 sub-blocks) granted 9/1//2020, expires 9/1/2026. • Ownership: 100% owned by Peak View Exploration Pty Ltd. • Location: approximately 100 km south of Canberra and 30 km north east of Cooma in New South Wales. • The Project area can be accessed from heading east on Rose Valley Road www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area from the Monaro Highway • Land use: Primarily grazing and cropping on gently undulating hills. • Environmental: No mineral production, coal, petroleum, or infrastructure permits within tenement areas. Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Historic exploration (1971-2023): o Nova Nickel NL/Western Mining (1971-1975): Early geological mapping, stream sediment sampling. o Western Mining (1975 - 1984): Geological mapping, soil sampling, Geophysics including IP, Sirotem and magnetics surveys, drilling. o Delta Gold (1993): Stream sediment sampling. o Denehurst (1995-1996): Radiometric and aeromagnetic survey, drilling. o Ironbark Zinc (2007 – 2012): Drilling o Peak View Exploration (2022-2023): rock chip sampling Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • The Peak View Project lies within the Molong-South Coast Anticlinorial Zone of the Lachlan Fold Belt in New South Wales. • The tenement is dominated by Ordovician sediments of the Adaminaby Group and Jerangle Metamorphic Complex while being bounded to the east by Devonian Granites. Drill hole information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: - easting and northing of the drill hole collar - elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar - dip and azimuth of the hole • Total drilling: 27 holes (RC, Diamond) completed 1975-2012 • Key intersections from Peak View area listed in Peak View drill intersection table in Appendix B. • Depth testing: Only 3 holes drilled >250 m depth, all intersected gold/base minerals mineralisation. • Collar coordinates: Historic local grids, conversion to modern coordinate system completed. • Complete drill hole database: Requires compilation and re-validation from multiple operators in the field. www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary - down hole length and intersection depth - hole length. • If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. • Where aggregate intersections incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. • The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. • Historic reporting: Intersections reported at various cut-off grades (See table 2 of Appendix B). • Composites in drill intersection table calculated using a minimum mineralised intersect of 0.2m, a maximum of 0.2m internal waste. • Metal equivalent values are not reported. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intersection lengths • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. • If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. • If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’). • Mineralisation geometry: Steeply east-dipping shear zones (typically 70- 80° dip). • Drill hole orientation: Generally, 60° toward grid west. • True width estimation: Most intersections are at moderate angle to mineralisation, true widths not known but estimated at 60-80% of down- hole length. • Reporting: Historic results reported as down-hole lengths. True width is not known. • The relationship between rock chip samples and mineralized widths are not known www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intersections should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views • Maps and sections are included in the body of this Report as deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results. • Historic reporting documents both high-grade intersections and lower grade zones. • Peak View intersection table lists all significant intersections. • High-grade intersections not followed up in historic programs, indicating potential remaining targets. • Rock chip information and results are provided in Table 1 & 3. Other substantive exploration data • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. • Geophysics: aero magnetics, IP surveys, ground gravity and Radiometric. • Geochemistry: Extensive soil sampling programs, stream sediment surveys. • Bulk density: Not systematically measured in historic programs. • The local Silurian geology consists of an eastern horizon of acid crystal and lithic tuffs (chlorite-bearing in places) and a more complex variable western horizon with fine-grained acid tuffs, aphanitic lava flows, limestone, quartzites and cherts. Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or large-scale step out drilling). • Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. • Work program (Year 1-2,): o Field mapping and geological model updates. o Soil and rock chip sampling programs. o Gravity & I.P geophysical surveys o Drilling program • Priority targets: o 10km of contact prospective for massive sulphides. o Down-plunge extensions at Peak View (only 3 holes >250 m depth). o Southern Zone - broad lower-grade system needs systematic drilling. www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary o Northern extension - untested area. o Exploration potential: 2.5 km strike length. o High-grade Big Badja Silver Mine o Northern strike extension of Big Badja Silver Mine (Pb-Zn soil anomaly) o 10km of highly prospective granite contact Appendix B: Black Hammer JORC Code, 2012 Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Rock Chip Sampling • Rock Chips are broken from outcrop or float using a steel Estwing geological hammer, the entire sample (nominal 0.5kg) is pulverised to produce a 30g charge for fire assay (AU-AA23) to analyse for Au and 0.25g is used for multielement analysis (ME-MS61), where it uses a four acid digestion to dissolve nearly all minerals. It’s then measured using a mass spectrometer and optical emission spectrometer. • Sample locations are marked using handheld GPS • Sampling is conducted by Company personnel • Lithology, alteration and mineralogy are logged in the field and entered into a spreadsheet by a company geologist Historic sampling o Geochemical surveys include 264 rock chip samples. www.exultantmining.com.au Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000 T: +61 (08) 9481 0389 E: info@exultantmining.com.au ACN 684 147 484 Criteria JORC Code Explanation Commentary o Drilling included 39 Air core drilling by North Ltd. o Stream sediment sampling. Drilling Techniques • Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open- hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • No drilling has been conducted by current vendors. • Historic drilling includes 39 air core drill holes by North Ltd. Drill Sample Recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • No information available on sample recovery methods or assessments for historic drilling. • Recovery data not consistently documented in historic reports. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • Limited geological logging information available from historic drilling. • No systematic geological or geotechnical logging documented to support mineral resource estimation. Subsampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core tak